July 24, 2009

  • Sex Education


    SEX IS EVILLLL. ABSTAIIIN OR ROT IN HELLLL.

    I'm kidding, of course, but other people aren't when they say that.  The above was essentially the "sex education" I received growing up, all the way until age eighteen.  I honestly received messages as simple (or complex) as "Sex before marriage is bad, sexual desire before marriage is bad, and homosexual sexual desire is bad at all times always."  I don't remember getting any formal sex education until I was required to take health class in high school and I didn't take that until my junior year.  I repeat: MY JUNIOR YEAR.  With at least one of my sources saying that roughly 70% of American teens are no longer virgins by their seventeenth birthday (which was junior year for me), I have one thing to say about that: That was too late in my life; it should not have taken me that long to get educated about sex.  Oh, and when I say "educated" I say it in the loosest way possible, such as "This is what herpes looks like" and "Maybe you shouldn't be embarrassed to buy condoms at the drug store." 

    My sex education in my public high school was abstinence-only to receive that beautiful federal dollar and, while it didn't teach "morality" (limiting sex to that within the bounds of marriage), it did well with avoiding discussion about the use of contraceptives.  I simply learned about STIs, condom failure rates, date rape and rape kits, and the wonderful physical and emotional costs to sex outside of marriage and/or at an early age.  I firmly believe, from my very core, I did not learn enough.

    Each year, U.S. teens experience as many as 850,000 pregnancies, and youth under age 25 experience about 9.1 million sexually transmitted infections (STIs).  By age 18, 70 percent of U.S. females and 62 percent of U.S. males have initiated vaginal sex.  Comprehensive sex education is effective at assisting young people to make healthy decisions about sex and to adopt healthy sexual behaviors.  No abstinence-only-until-marriage program has been shown to help teens delay the initiation of sex or to protect themselves when they do initiate sex.  Yet, the U.S. government has spent over one billion dollars supporting abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. Although the U.S. government ignores it, adolescents have a fundamental human right to accurate and comprehensive sexual health information.*

    I grew up in a sheltered conservative Christian environment.  Every facet of the media -- radio, television, Internet, movies, books, CDs -- was monitored by my parents (or church).  From the prohibition of shows like "Friends" to the outright blockage of web search categories like "Sex" or "Alternative lifestyle" I had no exposure to anything they didn't want me to see.  I went to seminars held by the authors of such books like Pure Revolution, Don't Date Naked, Boy Meets Girl: Say Hello to Courtship, and Dateable; was directed to sites like the Pure Love Club, The "Dateable 'Rules for the Sexes'", The 5 Commandments of Dating and web broadcasts such as "The Arrogance of Sexual Sin"; and signed my virginity over to God around age twelve.  (If you didn't click any of those links, check out the video clips that accompany a book of this nature I spent some time reading at Barnes & Noble last night -- and leave a comment with your thoughts!  Especially "Sex" and "What Girls Want" -- and if you need an extra giggle, watch the "music video".)

    These dating books contained my sex education as well as my moral education.  I learned from them (and remember, I grew up as a "young woman") that if I "gave away" my virginity, I was left used, unattractive, undesirable, and emotionally and morally crippled.  Essentially, I was told that having sex would both ruin me and the man I had it with (women of desire were never addressed, because naturally all women like men) and cause God to be displeased.  Luckily I was never attracted to men in my adolescence and I was able to escape the consequences of this upbringing in any "real" way: consequences like viewing myself as a failure if I failed to adhere to this unnecessary ideal of virginity until marriage, or a pregnancy or STI from not knowing how to protect myself.

    Let's be real, morality doesn't control biological function, it just shapes your perception of things; hearing that you will be ruined from having sex will change your perspective, yes, but in the heat of the moment, that perspective may not be enough to "save" you.  While the fact may be that abstinence doesn't fail, people do fail at abstaining (I stole this phrase from someone else on Xanga, I'm pretty sure).  It shouldn't be wrong for that to be taught.  But it also shouldn't be wrong to teach that, while not 100% effective, there are contraceptives that are 99.9% effective to protect you; they are imperfect, and there are a lot of factors that can lower their effectiveness, but they're there.  I've yet to come across a comprehensive safe sex education program that does not communicate this message, which is one of the many reasons why I support comprehensive sex education so strongly. 

    Sex education should be about what sex is, not whether or not it's good or bad.  Leave that up to the church or parents to teach.  But sex education needs to be taught in schools, because if you leave it up to the church and parents, you end up with a kid like me who doesn't know a damn fact about sex until eighteen, nineteen years old. 

    The reality is that kids as young as eight and nine are experimenting with each other and each others' bodies and, though they can't quite impregnate each other they can still cause each other significant emotional distress.  They are not doing sexual things because they're little deviants, but because they're curious and don't know any better.  As it is, the less you know, the more you want to try it and see for yourself what everyone is talking about.  Evaluations of comprehensive sex education and HIV/ STI prevention programs show that they do not increase rates of sexual initiation, do not lower the age at which youth initiate sex, and do not increase the frequency of sex or the number of sex partners among sexually active youth.  Kids don't experiment with sex because they were educated too early, but because they weren't educated enough

    As a big side note to young sexual education, those who know what sex is--or at least vaguely understand the importance of those parts of the body--are more likely to speak up if they are being sexually abused, because they are more likely to understand what is happening.  One-in-four females are in some way sexually abused before their twelfth birthday (I don't know about the statistics for males but it is likely similar; however due to infrequent reports the statistics don't currently reflect that) and it would be empowering to our children to be able to stand up for their bodies as opposed to being confused about what is happening.  As a personal anecdote to this, I was molested around age six or seven and, being aware of that part of my body for the first time, I engaged in quite a bit of risky experimentation, from age eight until about age eleven.  I loved sexual gratification at age ten.  When I learned that I was supposed to be ashamed of my body and that God would be upset to know of what I was doing with it at about eleven, I repressed my sex drive.  It wasn't until I was thirteen that I came into the awareness that I was molested.  And it wasn't until I was nineteen or so that I (re)experienced sexual attraction to another person.  Sexual attraction was (unhealthily) missing from my life my entire adolescence, and I do strongly blame this on my lack of a proper education.

    I am an advocate for educating children on complicated or "adult" issues at the earliest possible age, in age-appropriate ways.  This includes topics such as sexual activity, sexual abuse, homosexuality, transsexuality, and various lifestyles and the perspectives that shape them.  I do not believe in abstinence-only education.  I believe comprehensive sex education is a MUST and should be incorporated into every school year as the students grow and change and are able to understand more about their bodies and the importance behind what is being taught.  Sex isn't bad, but it does have consequences.  Children should understand the consequences of sex, the "other side" from what the media is showing them about how sex is pleasurable and, well, commonplace, even.  It should be addressed the way all other aspects of health are addressed, like making sure you wash your hands after using the restroom or playing in the dirt or sneezing or whatever else is unsanitary.  It should be brought down off its pedestal and made real to people.  It shouldn't be a taboo, heterosexual sex and homosexual sex alike.

    *This paragraph was taken from the Advocates for Youth webpage, which you should certainly check out.

    Also here are some other useful links:
    First Intercourse Info
    First Gynecological Exam Info
    Info on Contraceptives
    Planned Parenthood - Health Topics Index
    Go Ask Alice! - Columbia University's Health Q&A

Comments (7)

  • You are right ,sex needs to be addressed and taught. Kids are much better with choices and facts,guidance and conversation than too many rules.

  • "The reality is that kids as young as eight and nine are experimenting
    with each other and each others' bodies and, though they can't quite
    impregnate each other they can still cause each other significant
    emotional distress.  They are not doing sexual things because they're
    little deviants, but because they're curious and don't know any
    better.  As it is, the less you know, the more you want to try it and
    see for yourself what everyone is talking about. "

    Thank you! I was attracted to girls at a young age - and we played games of touching and kissing, and things like that, so I didn;t even know it was bad until my parents found out and started to try and 'cure' me. I was also raped several times between the ages of ten and twelve, by boys my own age, and I really didn't know much of what was going on, other than I didn't like it and it felt wrong. All I knew about sex then was that it was BAD (according to my parents). So when the time came for me learning about sex, (or rather, being taught abstinence, and not learning much of anything until I was in high school) I suddenly had this mentality and this idea that I was already damaged goods. Of course, no one knew what had happened, I didn't tell my parents about it until I moved out. I'm pretty sure my dad doesn't believe me.

    I was lucky, too, I wasn't actually attracted to males until I was 18 or 19, even though I had relationships with them, so sex was a non-issue. By the time I had a boyfriend that I was actually attracted to and wanted that kind of contact with, my sister had had a pregnancy scare - so my aunt sat us down (since there was no way we could trust our parents not to overreact) and explained everything to us that our parents and teachers never did.

    You're completely right, and our schools need, desperately need, sex education at younger ages than they give it, and much better sex-ed as well.

  • Completely agree 100% I was in sex ed classes first in 5th grade so I was 10/11, again in health for 7th grade so I was 12/13 and again in high school at 15. Sadly elementary and middle school sex ed had more information and was taught BETTER than in High school.

    The more I knew about the risks the less chances I was willing to take with my body. I stayed a virgin until I met my husband. Not because of pre-marital sex issues, but because I respected my body enough not to put myself in a dangerous situation. With all the std's and everything else, I saw sex as an unnecessary danger away from someone that was as committed as myself. Willing to go get tested with me before having sex and so on.

    I would encourage anyone that wants to have sex, to make sure you and the person you want to have sex with gets tested first. Unless they have something to hide they shouldn't care. And being a 'vigin' doesn't mean they might not have something. 

  • great links!

    strangely, I had the good luck to get an excellent health teacher, despite attending an all-girls catholic high school. she was very condom-positive and she understood that even though abstinence-only was the official program, it wasn't effective in real life. However, this was the first school-based sex-ed I had (junior year for me too, though my mum did a pretty good job at home), and considering kids were having fits in 3rd grade (again, catholic school) whenever they heard the word "sex", it needs to start muuuuch earlier. 

  • this is an extraordinarily great post

    That's really all I should say but sometimes I can't help myself. There's just one thing I disagreed with you about. You say that morality shouldn't be taught in schools just the information ("Sex education should be about what sex is, not whether or not it's good or bad.  Leave that up to the church or parents to teach. "), but that's really surprisingly hard to separate out in practice. For example it's a fact that homosexuality is a natural phenomenon, but some would consider teaching that fact imposing your morality upon someone. Trying to enforce educators to leave out the morality of sex is asking of them a virtually impossible thing. They would have to tip toe over topics like homosexuality in order to not offend. Kids would go home and tell their parents what they learned in school and parents would complain and say "Hey you said you weren't going to teach morality!"

    Comprehensive education I think has to teach a basic moral outlook that is as generic and accepting as possible. Namely that our bodies aren't bad, that sex is natural, that masturbation is natural, that contraceptives aren't bad, that homosexuality isn't bad, etc. etc. And it should make no bones about that.  Parents and churches can then teach people whether or not they *should* have sex and by what age, but schools absolutely should not be condoning destructive belief systems that make kids feel ashamed of their bodies or the experiences they've had. Schools have a responsibility to help children preserve their mental healths as well. That's part and parcel of the whole educational experience too. I strongly suspect far more people fail at classes because of mental and emotional distress and unresolved psychological disorders than ever do from being unable or unwilling to do the school work.

    No one should be allowed to teach a child that because they had this or that experience that they are worthless. Not a preacher. Not a parent. Not a teacher. That's emotional abuse. Plain and simple. It may be far too common and ingrained in society for us to make it illegal at this point in history, but we can absolutely make it so that schools are not allowed to not teach kids that this perspective, no matter who tells you it, is just plain wrong. Public schools can be changed to do this tomorrow if we want. And we SHOULD want. Private schools would be harder and would require a law of Congress that enforces it, and you'd probably run into legal issues even with that. But that should be done too as soon as possible if only because it's faster to pass a law than to let market preference eventually shift people over to the schools that teach the best information and far too many kids would be left out if we wait.

  • @nephyo - Thank you for this comment.  I agree with everything you said here.  Very strongly.

  • I'm sorry you were molested. :( And it's an awful shame that you were taught to be ashamed of sexual feelings when you were young. Sex education is necessary indeed.

Comments are closed.

Post a Comment